Re: Technical Comparison
- From: dov imagic weizmann ac il
- To: gilbertd treblig org
- Cc: dcarrera math toronto edu, gtk-perl-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Technical Comparison
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:02:10 IST
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 02:46:15PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
Not true. There are tools such as SWIG (www.swig.org I think) that take
either C or C++ and generate bindings for Tcl, Perl and many other
scripting languages mostly automatically. I've used this extensively on
C++ and Tcl - it works a treat.
Unfortunately it is not that easy to export any C++, even if you are
using swig (which I have done quite a lot). There is a philosophical
difference between gtk and qt. gtk was designed from the very beginning
to make it as easy as possible to create bindings. Qt was created
to make a strong C++ tied library. As far as I understand, mapping
the C++ hierarchy of Qt to a script language is quite a feat. Just
compare the number of languages that provide support for Gtk vs
for Qt.
Regards,
Dov
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]