Re: Technical Comparison
- From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <gilbertd treblig org>
- To: Daniel Carrera <dcarrera math toronto edu>
- Cc: gtk-perl-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Technical Comparison
- Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 14:46:15 +0000
* Daniel Carrera (dcarrera math toronto edu) wrote:
Hello,
I have been looking for a technical comparison of GNOME/Gtk+ vs KDE/Qt.
I am most interested in this comparison from Perl's point of view, but any
comparative information would be appreciated.
I've not seen any bindings for KDE/Qt to scripting languages - a great
shame.
Could someone help me out here?
This is the current extent of my understanding:
- Since Gnome/Gtk+ it's written in C, it's easier to make bindings for
other languages. Indeed, there are more bindings for Gnome/Gtk+ than
KDE/Qt.
Not true. There are tools such as SWIG (www.swig.org I think) that take
either C or C++ and generate bindings for Tcl, Perl and many other
scripting languages mostly automatically. I've used this extensively on
C++ and Tcl - it works a treat.
One of the things I don't understand is why a lot of the Gnome language
bindings are independent when something like SWIG could be used to make
bindings for most of the scripting languages in one go.
Dave
---------------- Have a happy GNU millennium! ----------------------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy \
\ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM, SPARC and HP-PA | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]