Re: Fwd: Malayalam & SF_PROCESS_ZWJ
- From: "Praveen A" <pravi a gmail com>
- To: gtk-i18n-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Fwd: Malayalam & SF_PROCESS_ZWJ
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:55:21 +0530
2007/6/20, Mahesh T. Pai <paivakil gmail com>:
When this was pointed out in the Unicode indic list, the response was
to encode the chillus, which was opposed by a section of Language
experts, stating that a ``foreign body'' like UTC cannot change the
Malayalam characters.
Mahesh, you are giving a totally wrong reason for opposing encoding
chillus. It may be how you perceive it but the fact are different. I
don't want to extend the flame wars into this also.
But the issues AFAIK are
1) backwards compatibility
2) dual encoding
3) collation order
Also the current issue is similar to "case folding" in case of IDN.
You might remember the examples Rajiv gave opposing the atomic
encoding.
"PenIsland" and "PenisLand". Ignoring ZWJ will have only this effect
for Malayalam (which is already there in latin).
Whatever that be, the current position is that the chillu characters
are in the pipeline, for inclusion in the next (post 5.whatever
version we have now) revision. Once this is adopted formally, our
headache would be to how to deal with legacy data.
It would bring a whole lot of issues just to satisfy some peoples
egos. Do you have an answer to the case folding argument?
The earlier UTS was ambiguous on the issue of using ZWJs, for chillu
rendering and different parties applied their own interpretations.
AFAIK both parties on the chillu debate have accepted
<consonant><halant>ZWJ as the chillu. Both Rachana and Anjali follow
this.
I have serious doubts about use of zwj/zwnjs in non-chillu context in
Malayalam.
ZWNJ is absolutely essential to prevent Malayalam conjunct formation
rules for adopted words and names like "hard_ware" and "tamizh_nadu".
If we are going to get rid of the ZWNJ we will have to encode all the
"non-joining conjuncts".
Can any body point out a requirement for use of zwj/zwnj in a
non-chilu context in Malayalam (and abesnce/presence of zw[n]j causing
a meaning difference)?
As for examples, I have give two above, even though you could infer
the meaning it would be awkward rendering.
Please think of the language above the egos, once the chillus are
encoded it is going to remain for eternity and the new problems that
it brings. You might want to talk some of the people like Ralminov who
were earlier supporting atomic chillus but have changed there stands
after understanding the reasons.
Cheers
Praveen
--
പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്
Join The DRM Elimination Crew Now!
http://fci.wikia.com/wiki/Anti-DRM-Campaign
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]