Re: Widget states for 3.0 (and 2.18?)

On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 23:38 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:

> its hard for me to see anything other than
>           active/inactive
>           sensitive/insensitive
> that are required to be mutually exclusive. its only "paired states"
> that require this kind of thing, and if we have 2 of them already,
> thats probably just about enough. am i missing something?

What would be special about those pairs? Other states could be seen as
pairs, too:
  default/not default

So all just boolean, actually.

I thought the issue was that currently states that shouldn't be mutually
exclusive are.

However, insensitive is special, as it makes everything else

Thorsten Wilms

thorwil's design for free software:

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]