Re: Widget states for 3.0 (and 2.18?)

On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 10:42 -0500, Cody Russell wrote:
> Right, but I guess that's part of the point of all this.  Wouldn't it
> make more sense if we try to move this type of information into a
> single location instead of having these kind of work-arounds?

Correct, my point was really that there seem to be two distinct data
sets needed: one mutually exclusive set and one that isn't.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]