Re: Widget states for 3.0 (and 2.18?)

On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 15:17 +0100, Neil Jagdish Patel wrote:
> Right. Although in my mind the checkbox is active when in that state
> (same for radiobuttons), so it would make sense to have a bit-field for
> states.

Yup, this is why I suggested using an enum for the generic states that
are mutually exclusive, and a separate bitfield for other more specific
states. However, I realise that checked and unchecked are clearly
mutually exclusive as well so still not ideal...



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]