Re: ChangeLog format
- From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org>
- To: Johan Dahlin <jdahlin async com br>
- Cc: Cody Russell <bratsche gnome org>, gtk-devel-list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: ChangeLog format
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 16:46:41 -0400
On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 17:13 -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote:
>
> I always try to do:
>
> 2008-05-27 Matthias Clasen <mcl redhat com>
>
> * gtk/gtkprintunixdialog.c: Disconnect signal handlers when
> the dialog closes. (#531008, Yevgen Muntyan).
>
> Where the name(s) after the bug are all persons involved in solving
> the bug.
>
> Which I think that I picked up from Matthias, but it appears he's not
> using
> that format any longer.
I proposed the new format in March:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2008-March/msg00023.html
Tim asked me to propose it. And Matthias said he doesn't mind using it.
Morten called it "a solution looking for a problem" and suggested that
it would be "another barrier to participation in gtk+ maintenance".
Which makes me wonder how are we going to trust anyone who can't do a
middle-click paste of the bug line when committing...
So yeah, I suggest people use the new format. It's more informative,
and easier to write. Here is how you do it: while you have the but page
open in your browser, triple-click on the title line of the bug page
(the line above "View Bug Activity". Then bring your editor up and at
middle-click to paste the bug line into the ChangeLog.)
> Johan
> ________________________
--
behdad
http://behdad.org/
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]