Re: libglade frustration

[tomas tuxteam de]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:00:37AM +0100, David NeÄas (Yeti) wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:44:21PM -0800, wallace owen l-3com com wrote:
[...]
> libglade developers do not produce any binary packages.
>
> Their product does come with examples.
>
> Requiring that the examples have to be included in full in
> the text of the manual instead of in a compilable form as
> standalone files is silly.

You took it back to the point. I think metaphors don't help much here.
The question is whether usage examples belong to the documentation or
not. As we see, this question is debatable. Personally, I'd side clearly
with the "yes" side.

Regards
- -- tomÃs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF0/XYBcgs9XrR2kYRAi3BAJ4g3E/refaqwbtgEX921oO6UwLWagCZAeUe
BHC3UYcdCnaVUBJ4vGi3Zq8=
=36mv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----