Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Windows Netmeeting compatibility

[Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>]

On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 07:36:48AM -0600, Chris Tooley wrote:
> On Fri, 2001-12-28 at 07:18, Dale E Martin wrote:
> > > It is a matter of taste.
> > 
> > Let's take this as fact up front - then we won't feel the need to have a
> > flame war and can have a nice friendly discussion about the two.
> > 
> > > I think that the best applications are always present first in GTK and/or
> > > for Gnome. There are several examples, like Gimp (GTK), Galeon (GTK),
> > > Evolution (GTK/Gnome), GnomeMeeting (hum hum hum ;), ...
> > 
> > I'd actually say that I like Konqueror better than Galeon (Galeon is nice
> > too of course), and I'd add gnumeric to the lists of excellent apps
> > available for gnome.
> >  
> > > I think that the architecture under Gnome 2 will be excellent.  But it is
> > > your choice to choose between KDE or Gnome. Many users use GnomeMeeting
> > > under KDE (like Enzo, or Jeff Mills, ...) and do not see any need to have
> > > a KDE application.
> >  
> 
> Well, I can see a good reason for having a QT interface.  The widgets
> are different and give a different look and feel for the application.  A
> QT app would give a more unified feel to the application.  Plus if
> Gnomemeeting is the only gnome app that you use, it's an awfully small
> program to install all of the gtk dependencies for, when you've already
> got a perfectly good QT library set.

Simply use a QT like theme for GTK ;)
But you are right for the dependancies. Ther everse is true too.

-- 
 _	Damien Sandras
(o-	GnomeMeeting - H.323 Video-Conferencing application -
//\		web:  http://www.gnomemeeting.org/
v_/_	FOSDEM 2002  - Free Software and Open Source Developers Meeting -
		web:  http://www.fosdem.org/