[PloneSoftwareCenter] Episode VI: The return of the DOAP
- From: "Simone Deponti" <shywolf9982 gmail com>
- To: gnome-web-list gnome org
- Subject: [PloneSoftwareCenter] Episode VI: The return of the DOAP
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:04:56 +0100
Hello,
I hope everyone had a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, and that the impact with the first week of work after the holidays hasn't been too dramatic.
After celebrating the holidays like they deserved (which usually involves an abnormal dose of alcoholic beverage, atleast here in Italy), I've branched PloneSoftwareCenter trunk to branches/doap-support (but not while drunk). I've also updated the wiki with all the information I thought necessary to start the project (and here one might suspect I was drunk when I did, but I wasn't).
Basically, I've reworked the tasks a bit in order to make them fit with the "two-way" developement we're going to follow (some changes will be made on PloneSoftwareCenter branch, some others are reserved for a customization product for Gnome only).
There are many "hot-spots" that probably need to be discussed, so I'd like to receive feedback on what I wrote.
On the mere technical side, I've come to the following proposal:
- Keep the views in sync with what's in trunk (making it easier for my branch to get back in trunk when ready).
- Add new views if we need a different presentation logic, instead of messing with the existing ones.
- Try to shove the maximum amount of info permitted by the specifics of DOAP into the feed. In math terms, if the attributes defined by the DOAP spec form set A, and the attributes defined into the PloneSoftwareCenter implementation form set B, we should try to make our feed capable to export the attributes defined by the a A
∩ B (intersection between A and B). This on the consideration that the set of attributes we want to be defined (as seen in the wiki) is a subset of set B.In the following days I'll shut up and start committing some decent code :).
--
Simone Deponti
-------------------------------------------
<fabz> I think we need to work on our communication.. one guy is talking crap, one just goes "lol" and the other one doesn't understand what's going on
<atsleek> lol
<Nefemus> what?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]