Re: [wgo] XHTML1.0 Strict vs HTML 4.01

["Alexander Limi" <limi plone org>]

On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 08:20:34 -0800, Olav Vitters <olav bkor dhs org> wrote:

> I saw those more often when triaging Mozilla bugs. Short description for
> people not wanting to click:
> <script src="foo.js" ... /> is not valid as text/html (Gecko parser will
> not see the tag has been closed), while it would be under
> application/xhtml+xml.

Plone never uses JS outside the head tag anyway, which should minimize  
this (we've never had problems with it, at least - and Plone serves XHTML  
as text/html by default, and has done so for the last five years of  
browser development).

To reiterate, we have never, ever had any problems resulting from this,  
whether it's considered technically "wrong" or not.

--
_____________________________________________________________________

     Alexander Limi � Chief Architect � Plone Solutions � Norway

 Consulting � Training � Development � http://www.plonesolutions.com
_____________________________________________________________________

      Plone Co-Founder � http://plone.org � Connecting Content
  Plone Foundation � http://plone.org/foundation � Protecting Plone