Re: [wgo] XHTML1.0 Strict vs HTML 4.01
- From: "Alexander Limi" <limi plone org>
- To: gnome-web-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [wgo] XHTML1.0 Strict vs HTML 4.01
- Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 21:50:16 -0800
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 21:20:14 -0800, Ricky Zhou <ricky zhou gmail com>
wrote:
Because of this, it is necessary to use HTML to fulfill the requirements
at this point.
Bullsh*t. No browsers have a problem with XHTML, not even Netscape 4.
We have used and supported XHTML with Plone for over 5 years, and have
never run into any trouble with it (and have lots of upsides wrt.
parsing and handling).
In any case, I don't have time for discussions like this, I just
wanted to state why I think this discussion is pointless and just
sucks time that could be spent on useful efforts.
— Alexander Limi — http://limi.net —
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]