Re: [wgo] XHTML1.0 Strict vs HTML 4.01

[Ricky Zhou <ricky zhou gmail com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alexander Limi wrote:
> Plone (which the wgo project uses) exclusively uses XHTML templates,  
> everywhere. If you want to reinvent and manually modify the 200+ templates  
> in Plone to use HTML 4 instead of XHTML, there's quite a lot of work to do.
Well, as a Plone founder, you definitely know more about Plone than I
do.  Since we're making our own skin from scratch, will this be such a
huge problem?  The templates that I've seen in the SVN seem to cover all
of the markup, so I hope this won't be such a huge problem (although I
really wouldn't mind doing it-  I could just feed them all to Tidy or a
quick Perl script).

Still, according to the requirements at
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/WebPolicies, "We should support all major
browsers and versions, and not avoid the standards if there are
workarounds that we will use for the major browsers not complying to the
standards."

Because of this, it is necessary to use HTML to fulfill the requirements
at this point.

Ricky
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFdQGOiXbZ7NjlUcARAltDAJ9TQ1X81O+93eQ52Xi0YkmXXvnejgCgsS1c
MFxS+ToFT4mCmqB288xpuOY=
=f+/7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----