Re: [wgo] XHTML1.0 Strict vs HTML 4.01

["Alexander Limi" <limi plone org>]

On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 20:15:18 -0800, Ricky Zhou <ricky zhou gmail com>  
wrote:

> Given this fact, what reason do we have to write XHTML if it's never
> even seen as XHTML?

Sorry for being late to chime in here, but notwithstanding the various  
arguments for or against XHTML, there is one very good reason to use XHTML:

Plone (which the wgo project uses) exclusively uses XHTML templates,  
everywhere. If you want to reinvent and manually modify the 200+ templates  
in Plone to use HTML 4 instead of XHTML, there's quite a lot of work to do.

Plone uses XHTML 1.0 Transitional as its base, but can be upgraded to  
XHTML Strict if necessary.

--
_____________________________________________________________________

     Alexander Limi � Chief Architect � Plone Solutions � Norway

 Consulting � Training � Development � http://www.plonesolutions.com
_____________________________________________________________________

      Plone Co-Founder � http://plone.org � Connecting Content
  Plone Foundation � http://plone.org/foundation � Protecting Plone