Re: [Shotwell] Improve Shotwell Slideshow - Weekly Report #6
- From: Alexandre Rosenfeld <alexandre rosenfeld gmail com>
- To: Lucas Beeler <lucas yorba org>
- Cc: Shotwell lists yorba org, gnome-soc-list gnome org, Shotwell Team <shotwell yorba org>
- Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Improve Shotwell Slideshow - Weekly Report #6
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 15:30:31 -0400
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 19:59, Lucas Beeler <lucas yorba org>
How does this sound to you, Alexandre?
Sounds great, this will enable me to try everything I want to ;) The idea is still to ship this as some sort of plugin in the final application? If so, it could be possible to include it as an optional component on distributions that already have the newest versions of the libraries. But to be honest, I think it will be a lot of trouble creating a separate plugin with this code.
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Alexandre Rosenfeld
> *Alexandre Rosenfeld*
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 16:55, Jason D. Clinton <me jasonclinton com
>> Why is your mentor forcing you to support a distribution that is
>> already half-way through its life-cycle and has already been
>> superseded by a subsequent release? I hope there's a misunderstanding
>> as this not in the spirit of past GNOME Summer of Code mentoring. It
>> would not be unreasonable to request use of stable versions of
>> dependent libraries but nine months old is certainly outside of that
>> and actually counterproductive as you've clearly outlined above.
> The only reference I can find about Shotwell's policy on supporting older
> distributions is in this bug: http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3110
> And I think it's important that I follow the same policies as any other code
> written for Shotwell, if it's unreasonable or not actually depends on the
> project in my opinion. I would hate to see that my work is not included in
> Shotwell because I did not follow these policies.
> Shotwell mailing list
> Shotwell lists yorba org
] [Thread Prev