Re: My gripes with Gnome Shell



On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 16:05 +0200, Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, at 15:58, Sam Bull wrote:
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 09:42 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 14:31 +0200, Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, at 13:44, 0x90 wrote:
See this thread:
https://www.reddit.com/r/gnome/comments/53d5kz/need_dev_info_
abou
t_
legacy_traytopicons_plus_in/
To achieve this goal, all apps need to be redesigned.
After reading the thread I still don't know what the
replacement
is.
Just remove the tray icon? And run in the background without
illustrating that to the user?
I don't know - this seems reasonable to me.  If an application
has a
service component... just provide the service.  As a user why do
I
care? There is no need for me to see something unless something
happens.

Also, for email, the accounts can be setup in the control panel as
an
online account. If an account is setup through there, then it would
certainly be nice to have GOA or something trigger notifications 
for these accounts if an app is not open.

This would be similar to what the Ubuntu phone does with UOA,
though
this is more born out of the lifecycle requirement, that apps
aren't
allowed to run in the background.

While it makes sense for some applications, like email, it's rather
confusing for something like an IRC client: I don't want it to run at
start up, but I also want to be able to let it run in the background
without a window. Without the tray I have NO idea if my IRC client is
currently running (without using `ps aux` or something like that).

You can:
  (a) start it an minimize it - it appears in the tray.
   - or - 
  (b) have it start at startup.

I honestly cannot see a problem to be solved.

If it is running it appears in the tray underlined - that tells you it
is active.

Also the tray icon also shows other stuff: For Dropbox / Seafile it
shows when it's currently syncing data by spinning arrows.

A package could very well choose to contain a shell extension if it
needs some persistent custom presentation - a path exists to solve that
problem.  Many don't bother, likely, because it is a rather trivial
matter.  How often do you care if something is synchronizing?  It was
one of the failures of GNOME-2 is that the toolbar actively promoted a
kind of AD-HD;  when there was work to be done.

-- 
Adam Tauno Williams <mailto:awilliam whitemice org> GPG D95ED383
Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]