On 22/11/10 14:39, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 10:13 +0100, Andreas Wallberg wrote: >> If the users do not seem to "get" a particular design choice, please >> take a few moments to explain them. > > As a user I feel that GNOME 3 has been well explained many, many, > many... times. Perhaps those who don't understand could spend a few > seconds going out to find and *read* the explanation. Or there are even > audio / video talks from GUADEC about it; and at least one audio > interview from GUADEC. So you can *read*, *hear*, and *see* the > explanations of GNOME 3. Anyone who claims it isn't being explained is > a *troll*, full-stop. That is a completely backwards point of view. A good design would need almost no explanation. If many people do not "get" the Shell, then the design is wrong; maybe because the system was not designed with its prospective users in mind. Felipe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature