Re: Gnome objectives



On 22/11/10 14:39, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 10:13 +0100, Andreas Wallberg wrote: 
>> If the users do not seem to "get" a particular design choice, please
>> take a few moments to explain them.
> 
> As a user I feel that GNOME 3 has been well explained many, many,
> many... times.  Perhaps those who don't understand could spend a few
> seconds going out to find and *read* the explanation.  Or there are even
> audio / video talks from GUADEC about it; and at least one audio
> interview from GUADEC.  So you can *read*, *hear*, and *see* the
> explanations of GNOME 3.  Anyone who claims it isn't being explained is
> a *troll*, full-stop.

That is a completely backwards point of view. A good design would need
almost no explanation. If many people do not "get" the Shell, then the
design is wrong; maybe because the system was not designed with its
prospective users in mind.


Felipe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]