Re: viewing and editing the "run command" field of a launcher

[Peter Stein <nbi wideopenwest com>]

Christian Rose wrote:
> mån 2002-12-02 klockan 01.58 skrev Peter Stein:
>
> > You are correct. This is a bug that has been in existence for some time. 
> > I filed a bug with RedHat who in turn filed one with GNOME. The bug 
> > filed with GNOME is a duplicate of GNOME bug 83964. The fact that fairly 
> > intuitive steps led a GNOME novice to discover this soon after 
> > installing RH8 does not reflect well on GNOME. Of course sitting on this 
> > bug for over 6 months doesn't help matters either. That reflects poorly 
> > on both GNOME and RedHat which has been touting GNOME.
>
>
> Are you a paying customer? If yes, congratulations, you are helping
> improve the situation. But Red Hat still doesn't produce all the
> software included in RHL, so you can't expect it to be without bugs.

No, I'm not a paying customer. Apparently just someone who enjoys 
wasting his time doing somebody else's QA work for free.

Does the fact that I'm not a paying customer or code contributor 
invalidate my findings somehow?

> If you aren't contributing with code or by any financial contributions,
> you may consider doing so before demanding particular bugs to be fixed.

My demands regarding this issue are stated where exactly?

> Reporting or asking about bugs is one thing, demanding them to be fixed
> without anything in return is another.

Evidently your grasp of English is wanting as you seem to have 
difficulty identifying what constitutes a "demand". Again, where did I 
make a "demand"? So far I've asked a question and confirmed what another 
poster suggested along with explaining my interaction with RH & GNOME. 
Your constructive contribution to this thread has been what?