Re: [Breakage!] Red Hat packaging

[Chris Chabot <chabotc reviewboard com>]

Ps, just so u guys know, since i think that the spec files as they are now
on the ftp.gnome.org server are... well...dangerous, ive decided to rewrite
them. As basis i have taken the spec files from rawhide/gnomehide, and modified
them for proper versions, taken out redhat specific patches, and added proper
dependencies where available (to my best of knowledge).

this way you also get the proper dual gnome 1 / 2 setup (for base libs),
and proper warnings if your gnome 1 versions are to old (gnome libs, libglade,
etc).

I gues when im done, ill go raid bugzilla, and post bugs for each gnome 2
component, with the new spec file attached... If maintainers can intergrate
them into the cvsroot of their module, preferable in such a way that they
use a .spec.in, we would @least have a basic building system next release!

    -- Chris

Ross Golder wrote:
> What good is a shedload of specfiles unless tied to a particular
> checkout or tarball source? There's only one place to maintain spec
> files, and that's along with the packages in question (imho).
>
> I must admit, I had the same thought once, but decided it wouldn't do
> much good.
>
> --
> Ross
>
> On Sat, 2002-01-19 at 19:07, Roy-Magne Mo wrote:
> > On lau , 2002-01-19 at 02:19, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> > > I'll put the spec files up in a minute, and people can start hacking.
> > >       
> > How about making a cvs module for this? 
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gnome-packaging-list mailing list
> > Gnome-packaging-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-packaging-list
> >       
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnome-packaging-list mailing list
> Gnome-packaging-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-packaging-list
>