Re: Which editor for C/C++ programming, and more...
- From: Dave Reed <dreed capital edu>
- To: aidan skinner demon co uk
- CC: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Which editor for C/C++ programming, and more...
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 15:00:03 -0500 (EST)
> From: Aidan Skinner <aidan@skinner.demon.co.uk>
>
> Cory Watson writes:
>
> > As for strip, someone can probably give you more info than me, but to the
> > best of my understanding, strip removes alot of debugging information from
> > your executables. I'm sure theres more to it than that, but unless you
>
> Strip basically removes all the symbols it safely can, so you there
> isn't much for your debugger to latch onto.
>
> It can be useful when you want to distribute binarys, but doesn't
> (under linux anyway) affect the amount of RAM that your executable
> takes up because the debugging symbols _aren't_loaded_into_RAM_ to
> begin with. This may vary from OS to OS.
Interesting, I didn't know that. So only when you're using the
debugger are the symbols loaded?
> The only real use for strip these days IMO is when you have to
> distribute something in binary format where it has to be as small as
> possible (say, over a per-minute charge net-connection) or when you're
> comparing compilers (in which case the only fair comparision is to use
> the same code in each one, at maximum optimisation and no debugging
> information, and then strip the binaries before comparing for size etc).
Also, it takes up a lot of extra disk space on your disk if you're
storing all your binaries with debugging symbols.
Dave
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]