Re: Which editor for C/C++ programming, and more...
- From: Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>
- To: Dave Reed <dreed capital edu>
- cc: aidan skinner demon co uk, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Which editor for C/C++ programming, and more...
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 15:29:27 -0500 (EST)
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Dave Reed wrote:
> > It can be useful when you want to distribute binarys, but doesn't
> > (under linux anyway) affect the amount of RAM that your executable
> > takes up because the debugging symbols _aren't_loaded_into_RAM_ to
> > begin with. This may vary from OS to OS.
>
>
> Interesting, I didn't know that. So only when you're using the
> debugger are the symbols loaded?
Or rather, "the debugger is the only program that makes an effort to load
the symbol information".
> > The only real use for strip these days IMO is when you have to
> > distribute something in binary format where it has to be as small as
> > possible (say, over a per-minute charge net-connection) or when you're
> > comparing compilers (in which case the only fair comparision is to use
> > the same code in each one, at maximum optimisation and no debugging
> > information, and then strip the binaries before comparing for size etc).
If you are comparing size, you should probably just use the 'size' command
to get a better measurement.
-- Elliot
Red Hat, a Red Hat company
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]