Re: Gnome GPL question
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Preben Randhol <randhol pvv org>
- Cc: "Poletti, Don" <don poletti comverse-in com>, "'gnome-list gnome org'" <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Gnome GPL question
- Date: 06 Dec 1999 10:59:33 -0500
Preben Randhol <randhol@pvv.org> writes:
> "Poletti, Don" <don.poletti@comverse-in.com> writes:
>
> | Here's a "nuance" of the GPL I don't understand.
> |
> | Linux is GPLed (the kernel and other supporting executables) but it anyone
> | can
> | write any kind of application, commercial, freeware shareware etc. to run
> | on Linux. I thought it might be because the linux code was not linked in but
> | don't all executables libc and other libraries?
>
> Read the beginning of /usr/src/linux/COPYING
>
> | Where does Gnome fall? Is it a violation of its GPL to write a commercial or
> | shareware
> | Gnome app?
>
> As long as you don't distribute your code under GPL, it would seem so
> as the libs are GPL and not LGPL as GTK+ is.
>From gnome-libs/README
===
The GNOME libraries (libgnome, libgnomeui, gtk-xmhtml, zvt, vfs)
are released under the terms of the LGPL license, read the file
COPYING.LIB for more information.
===
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]