Re: 19980917 compiling

[Steve Luzynski <sluzynsk sound net>]

Todd Graham Lewis wrote:

> 1) Set up a Tinderbox arrangement so we can see when things break and
> where.

This would be good, since it seems to embarass people into not checking
in broken code. :) The mozilla.org pages says (quote) "It will be
difficult to get this working at your site". Plus, we'd need to have it
running somewhere where we could build (at minimum) against Linux, *BSD,
and Solaris 2.5/2.6, to try to cover the majority of the audience.
Unless it's decided that if it buils on Linux that's good enough for
this purpose.

Has anyone looked at the thing to see just how bad it is? I'm assuming
that we would at least need to get ALL the makefiles working 100% in all
circumstances -- no more "no action for target 'maintainer-clean'"
messages like there are so many of now.