Re: WM Compliance

>> Adam Jacob wrote:

>> So... is there a cannon definition of what Gnome requires of a WM?

Yes; see below.

>>>>> "Max" == Max  <> writes:

Max> I would be very interested in writing a canonical document
Max> describing "GNOME awareness" for a wm.

I already wrote this last week.  In fact, I posted two notes here
about it, and it was incorporated into the FAQ.  Here's my current

This should have pointers to everything a wm implementor needs.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]