Re: Fwd: Subversion migration schedule (cut-off Fri 18 Mar)

[Ross Golder <ross golder org>]

On พ., 2006-02-15 at 13:12 -0500, Kevin Kubasik wrote:
> My experience has been that the XMLRPC is just as reliable, but far
> more verbose, I would recommend it. It also means less worries about
> mail slowdowns at gnome.org.
> 
> My $0.02
> 

I've added the ciabot_svn.py script to post-commit file that the
migration script installs for each of our repositories, using XMLRPC
mode. Let's see how it goes.

--
Ross

> -Kevin Kubasik
> On 2/15/06, Ross Golder <ross golder org> wrote:
> > เมื่อ พ. 2006-02-15 เวลา 08:53 -0500, Kevin Kubasik เขียนว่า:
> > > A thought, what are plans for CIA project stats support? There are
> > > Subversion scripts[1] so that's no big, but in order to keep all
> > > existing project stats, do you think we should give them a ping and
> > > coordinate to some extent? Its not an essential service, but I know I
> > > use it (namely its RSS feeds) to keep from updating continuously while
> > > waiting for a commit.
> > >
> > > *1 http://cia.navi.cx/doc/clients
> > >
> > > -Kevin Kubasik
> > >
> >
> > Good point. By the look of it, this is should be easy enough - we just
> > add their hook script to the end of the post-commit for each of the
> > repositories. Anyone provide any advice on which of the scripts is best,
> > or should I just try the XMLRPC one out?
> >
> > It doesn't look any co-ordination with them will be necessary - if I
> > understand it right, we just pump commit notifications at them. However,
> > if you think it's worth it, feel free to drop them a note to tell them
> > to e-mail this list if they've got any questions or requests.
> >
> > --
> > Ross
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Cheers,
> Kevin Kubasik
> 
> http://kubasik.net/blog