Re: Using Git and separating translations into their own l10n-LL repository
- From: Gil Forcada <gforcada gnome org>
- To: "Jason D. Clinton" <me jasonclinton com>
- Cc: Simos Xenitellis <simos lists googlemail com>, GNOME i18n list <gnome-i18n gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Using Git and separating translations into their own l10n-LL repository
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:43:37 +0100
If damned-lies is able to commit files it will be "trivial" (Claude?) to
first check that the dist check is ok.
El dc 21 de 01 de 2009 a les 10:31 -0600, en/na Jason D. Clinton va
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Simos Xenitellis
> <simos lists googlemail com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Matej Urban <matej urban gmail com> wrote:
> >> Well, I'm sure the devels are able to make the system work in anyway
> >> they choose, that's why I yell so loudly to get all the po files of
> >> one language into one single directory. Now that would cut down the
> >> maintenance.
> > Earlier in this thread I mention a possible way to have all
> > translations for each language in its own repository (thus, single
> > folder). There where some advantages and disadvantages with this
> > process. I am not sure if you managed to try it using the test
> > repositories from github.com.
> > I believe there is a potential to adapt the proposal so that the
> > disadvantages are eliminated.
> > If you want to have a look at it, it would be great. I'ld be happy to
> > discuss about it.
> Given the number of times that translators have broken the build of
> our module, Gnome Games, because they don't run make check before they
> commit. I'm 100% opposed to any configuration in which translators are
> freed from the responsibility of making sure that they didn't break
> Both of these proposals are good ideas but will cause many headaches
> unless the make check is automated somehow.
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n gnome org
[ca] guifi.net - una xarxa lliure que no para de créixer
[en] guifi.net - a non-stopping free network
] [Thread Prev