Re: damned-lies: move "fifth-toe" modules in "gnome-extra" module set

[Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net>]

Le mercredi 22 avril 2009 à 12:34 +0200, Gil Forcada a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> El dc 22 de 04 de 2009 a les 12:22 +0200, en/na Luca Ferretti va
> escriure:
> > 2009/4/22 Gabor Kelemen <kelemeng gnome hu>:
> > > I agree to remove it too. Also, have anybody seen recently a
> > > gnome-office release? My google suggests[1] it is abandoned too.
> > 
> > Not as "official" suite
> > 
> > > How do we define "no longer maintained"? :)
> > > There are already a lot of modules[2], that saw no non-translation
> > > commits since years, where "years" can be 1-2-3... so, how long should
> > > we keep modules listed as translatable?
> > 
> > Crazy idea: what about a "starring" system? Like in Firefox
> > coordinators could make a star twinkle for untranslated or partially
> > tranlated modules they think are more important or urgent.
> > 
> > Too much crazy?
> 
> Not really, but maybe a calendar view with the expected releases of
> modules would be more useful (i.e. May 7th there will be a tracker
> release). Of course every module should have a maintainer and he/she
> would have an UI to set release dates (date and target branch to
> translate).
> 
> Then an RSS and/or a mail sent to this list (or coordinator teams) would
> be enough to have everyone up-to-date.
> 
> Sounds good?

Already filed: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=512537

Claude