Re: RFC: going to add 2.18 branch

[Priit Laes <amd store20 com>]

�el kenal p�al, K, 2006-10-04 kell 23:42, kirjutas Wouter Bolsterlee:
> 2006-10-04 klockan 21:10 skrev Abel Cheung:
> > On 10/5/06, Wouter Bolsterlee <uws+gnome xs4all nl> wrote:
> > > > I have done the necessary changes to switch to 2.18 release and
> > > > drop 2.14 branch data form status pages. It's ready for commit.
> > > > If anyway still like 2.14 to be there, please shout aloud, otherwise
> > > > I'll go ahead and commit the change (and pray).
> > > 
> > It's hard to draw the line here.

Can't we have both 2.18 and 2.14? If the problem is the amount of
time/power what it takes to generate the statistics - generation
frequency could be decreased for 2.14 series (once a few days or even a
week).

Keeping things near 100% is easier for me rather than discovering next
to string freeze that I have lots of modules near 50%.

PS. Sorry, Wouter, my bad that you were the only one to receive this letter ;)

Cheers,
Priit