Re: RFC: going to add 2.18 branch
- From: "Abel Cheung" <abelcheung gmail com>
- To: gnome-i18n gnome org
- Subject: Re: RFC: going to add 2.18 branch
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 03:10:13 +0800
On 10/5/06, Wouter Bolsterlee <uws+gnome xs4all nl> wrote:
> I have done the necessary changes to switch to 2.18 release and
> drop 2.14 branch data form status pages. It's ready for commit.
> If anyway still like 2.14 to be there, please shout aloud, otherwise
> I'll go ahead and commit the change (and pray).
Please don't remove the gnome-2-14 branches right now. Several large
distributions are shipping this version and sometimes it's useful to have
the translations available from the l10n-status pages when handling
translation issues reported bye users.
While I agree this is a valid reason to preserve it, here comes another
question: how to decide?
- Ubuntu dapper could be using 2.14 for _3_ straight years
- Mandriva, if following its 1-yr release schedule, may not ship 2.18 at all
- Solaris (well, I don't even know its release schedule)
- .......
It's hard to draw the line here.
Abel
mvrgr, Wouter
--
:wq mail uws xs4all nl
web http://uwstopia.nl
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFI/nLP7QTTiUKY+sRAuDUAKDE0eZurFNEM9mrVHiare8frLk4CgCbBGGm
gLJDEXoFredZ9+GnACib3c0=
=pTTv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
--
Abel Cheung (GPG Key: 0xC67186FF)
Key fingerprint: 671C C7AE EFB5 110C D6D1 41EE 4152 E1F1 C671 86FF
--------------------------------------------------------------------
* GNOME Hong Kong - http://www.gnome.hk/
* Opensource Application Knowledge Assoc. - http://oaka.org/
* My own cave: http://me.abelcheung.org/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]