Re: evolution-exchange, pot-file missing

[Rodney Dawes <dobey novell com>]

Right. It's easier to maintain if it's automated, and you don't have to
worry about it really. It got changed in CVS, because we needed to have
it so that the filenames were using 2.0, before we actually change the
evolution version to 2.0. I wasn't aware that the change was even made
in the way that it was. But it's all ok now.

I'll try to figure out how to fix intltool, soon. I'm part way there
now.

-- dobey


On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 05:14 +0800, Abel Cheung wrote:
> > (I only don't understand why did Rodney oppose this so much at the
> > start then)
> 
> I'd agree that this is a deficiency of intltool. The role of intltool
> is to help other modules, not restricting what other modules
> should / shouldn't do. Besides, fixing intltool sounds like a better
> solution than fixing all other modules in CVS. We have had few such
> problem simply because Christian filed a swamp of bug reports, asking
> others to change GETTEXT_PACKAGE to simpler values.
> 
> Abel
> 
> 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Danilo
> >