Le samedi 04 septembre 2004 à 13:29 +0200, Christian Rose a écrit : > Ouch, two whole GNOME releases back? AFAIR the gnomemeeting branch that > was used for GNOME 2.6 was from the gnomemeeting gnome-2-6 branch, so it > seems strange to go back to the even older gnome_2_4 branch. Is this > really intentional? > I'm completely wrong with what I said, not enough coffee yet. I checked my mail archive. When GnomeMeeting 1.0 was released, I have branched it with the tag gnome-2-6, and announced it to desktop-devel-list, gnome-i18n and the release team. HEAD has continued with daily developments. As HEAD was not ready to be released as a stable release, I couldn't respect the UI and string freezes, so I have not created a gnome-2-8 branch and I kept working on HEAD, mentionning to the release team that GNOME 2.8 would ship with GM 1.0.2. > I've updated the GNOME 2.8 translation status pages to show the > gnomemeeting gnome_2_4 branch now. It should show up as soon as the > pages update. Let's hope that translators will be able to retrofit their > translations into that branch. > I'm sorry it should be gnome-2-6. > But do other contributors know about the correct gnomemeeting branch to > use? I'm thinking of docs people and others that are mentioned on > http://developer.gnome.org/dotplan/for_maintainers.html that need > notification of new branches. I always notify when creating a new branch. People have been notified of the gnome-2-6 branch creation a bit before the GNOME 2.6 release. As HEAD was not ready for gnome 2.8, I have not created a gnome-2-8 branch. I suppose I will create a gnome-2.8 (or gnome 2.10 ?) branch once I'm ready to release GnomeMeeting 1.2. Is that the way you are expecting me to do things? Should I create a synonym gnome-2-8 branch for gnomemeeting that would correspond to the gnome-2-6 branch? > > The work of many contributors largely depend on them being able to spend > their time on the correct branches. Given that the module list is as big > as it is already, and the large number of contributors, any added > confusion doesn't help. Please be a bit more careful when branching and > announcing your branches in the future. Well, I never branched for GNOME 2.8, now I'm a bit puzzled, should I have done it? For 1.00, I branched GnomeMeeting HEAD into gnome-2-6 so that translators can update their translations for GNOME 2.6 and continued developing on head. For 1.2, GnomeMeeting was not ready for GNOME 2.8, consequently, I have not created a gnome-2-8 branch. Now, should I have done it? When should branching be done? When I'll release GnomeMeeting 1.2, will I put it in a gnome-2-8 or in a gnome-2-10 branch? Sorry for the confusion, I'm confused myself regarding what I should have done. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=