Re: Updating po files on make dist

Christian Rose <> writes:

> One could argue that that's just me being so "clumsy", but since it's
> reportedly not uncommon for maintainers to revert such committed diff
> files that break building, one can guess that it's not that uncommon of
> a problem among translators that don't expect others to touch their po
> file without prior warning.

I agree with you Christian. Having CVS conflicts just because the po
subdirectory is regenerated is lame. Currently, I always have to run
'ls -a' to make sure there isn't a not-broken file around. It's a

Ole Laursen

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]