Re: [gnome-flashback] Broken parts of GNOME Flashback with GNOME 3.12
- From: Sebastian Geiger <lanoxx gmx net>
- To: Mailing list for the Gnome Flashback project <gnome-flashback-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [gnome-flashback] Broken parts of GNOME Flashback with GNOME 3.12
- Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 15:23:32 +0200
IMHO, I would not rename it. Just document it better in the following places:
* In the package description.
* In the Wiki.
* In the package readme file.
Renaming it would also imply that its a flashback only thing which is not correct.
Best Regards
Sebastian Geiger
(via mobile device)
On 18.10.2014, at 02:08, Balló György <ballogyor gmail com> wrote:
2014-10-17 19:25 GMT+02:00 Alberts Muktupāvels <alberts muktupavels gmail com>:
Looks like I have green light for notification-daemon. I will probably add
myself as maintainer tonight. Things with gnome-screensaver looks little bit
more complicated:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2014-October/msg00088.html
Should we go with fork or add screensaver as part of gnome-flashback module?
I would prefer to keep the screensaver as a separated project, because
it can be used also in other desktop environments. E.g. xflock4 and
lxlock support screen locking with gnome-screensaver:
http://git.xfce.org/xfce/xfce4-session/tree/scripts/xflock4#n30
http://git.lxde.org/gitweb/?p=lxde/lxsession.git;a=blob;f=lxlock/lxlock#l30
I think the best would be to take over gnome-screensaver, and rename
it officially to 'gnome-flashback-screensaver' or 'gnome-lock', so
users will hopefully know that it's different from the lock screen
built in GNOME Shell. And keep the compatibility with the old binary
names at least with symlinks for a while.
--
György Balló
Arch Linux Trusted User
_______________________________________________
gnome-flashback-list mailing list
gnome-flashback-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-flashback-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]