Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] question re: marking index terms



On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:31:21PM -0800, Gregory Leblanc wrote:

> 
> I agree with you that scrollkeeper should be general, but we're already
> asking writers to use a subset of DocBook in the Handbook, and because
> of gnome-db2html2.  We have to impose some rules on our docs, or they'll
> become inconsistent, and unprofessional.  Erm, didn't mean to rant,
> sorry.  
> Anyway, I think that's a technically feasible solution for SK (at least,
> I can't see any reason why that's not possible).  Thanks,
> 

ScrollKeeper is not just a GNOME tool. If it is to serve its purpose,
it needs to be able to handle everyone's documents.

Cheers,
-- 
John Fleck
jfleck swcp com (h)
jfleck abqjournal com (w)
http://www.abqjournal.com/scitech/




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]