Re: GNOME A11y: where do we need to improve?

[Willie Walker <William Walker Sun COM>]

Hi David:

> Next week sounds good Will, but we should give folks some warning.

Sorry - yes, the reason I was asking folks for availability  was to set 
up a time that would be good for us.  :-)  I definitely wouldn't spring 
it on you like "we're going to meet.....NOW!".  :-)

I'm still waiting for more availability from a few folks and will set up 
some proposed times when I hear from them.

Thanks!

Will

David Bolter wrote:
> Willie Walker wrote:
> > Thanks Francesco!
> >
> >  
> > > > In addition, I would also like to raise the idea of making a proposal
> > > > to the GNOME release team that a11y become part of the new module
> > > > proposal process.  I'm curious what people think of that idea and who
> > > > would be willing to help test new modules for a11y.
> > > >       
> > > This would presuppose the existance of a clear specifications against 
> > > which the new modules could be tested. Does it already exist?
> > >     
> >
> > Agreed.  :-)  The testing spec/docs are old and out of date, but we 
> > have identified this as one of the most important tasks to get done on 
> > http://live.gnome.org/Accessibility/GetInvolved.  :-)
> >
> > BTW, I hope to be able to go through the most important tasks today 
> > and flesh them out some more.  I'd like to give people a clearer idea 
> > of the problems and the expected deliverables if they were to help us 
> > out in this space.  I'll send out info when I'm done.  Then we can all 
> > meet on IRC sometime next week or possibly even tomorrow.  Sound OK?
> >   
>
> Next week sounds good Will, but we should give folks some warning.
>
> D