Re: whoops



Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu> writes:

> I don't think such a dependency chain exists to justify gmc :/

If you want to have a splashy 2.0 you'll have to make sure, the 1.x
series will obey consistency.


-- 
work : ke suse de                          |                   ,__o
     : http://www.suse.de/~ke/             |                 _-\_<,
home : keichwa gmx net                     |                (*)/'(*)




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]