Re: whoops
- From: Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>
- To: Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc cu-portland edu>
- Cc: gnome-1 4-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: whoops
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:34:14 -0800
> pull one thing and replace it with another. The duplication is
> important, and it's been done elsewhere. imlib/gdk-pixbuf is the first
> example I come up with. I think the configure time option to turn
A decision which resulted in confusion and probably slowed the
transition to gdk-pixbuf. Plus there's a fundamental difference
here....which is that we probably wouldn't have included imlib if there
weren't things we wanted to include that depend on it. I don't think
imlib inherently pulled itself into the release, it was pulled in by a
dependency chain. I don't think such a dependency chain exists to
justify gmc :/
-Seth
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]