[Glade-devel] I'd like to know an architectural decision

The problem is that it conflicts in fact. After anjuta has added its
idle handler, glade adds it's own handler, which appears to be called
earlier than anjuta's handler, then (because main window isn't
realized still) adds itself as idle handler and appears to be called
earlier again. In that way it adds itself to the idle handlers

On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Tristan Van Berkom
<tristan.van.berkom at gmail.com> wrote:
 The g_idle_add() does not conflict with anything, its a timeout for
 the first idle moment
 and as such is more stable then adding any timeouts.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]