Re: [Gimp-developer] Fwd: Gimp Registry Future
- From: Alexandre Prokoudine <alexandre prokoudine gmail com>
- To: gimp-developer <gimp-developer-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Fwd: Gimp Registry Future
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 16:14:09 +0400
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Ingo Lütkebohle wrote:
Alexander,
the Registry currently has support for uploading binary plugins, so those
could be downloaded over the interface as well.
How the binary plugins arrive in the registry is a different issue. I don't
have much to offer on that front, because I can't compile for Windows and
Mac OS X. However, I could say that if we create an API-interface,
downloading and compiling a lot of plugins could probably be automated.
It's a wee bit more complicated. Think of e.g. security concerns.
Sure, you can sit down and analyze the code of every submitted plugin,
but this solution is not scalable, and a scalable solution (as in
"automated check for exploits") is likely to be expensive.
Which brings us back to the same old question about money and human resources.
Alexandre
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]