Re: [Gimp-developer] Fwd: Gimp Registry Future

[Ingo Lütkebohle <iluetkeb gmail com>]

Alexander,

the Registry currently has support for uploading binary plugins, so those
could be downloaded over the interface as well.

How the binary plugins arrive in the registry is a different issue. I don't
have much to offer on that front, because I can't compile for Windows and
Mac OS X. However, I could say that if we create an API-interface,
downloading and compiling a lot of plugins could probably be automated.

cheers


On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre prokoudine gmail com> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Ingo Lütkebohle wrote:
>
> > Regarding the server-side, my preference would be to keep Drupal right
> now.
> > We can fairly easily expose the existing database through the "Services"
> > module (see https://drupal.org/project/services). Once we have a clear
> > interface, changing either side should be possible at a later stage.
>
> Personally, I'm mostly concerned about binary plugins. We support
> Windows, Linux, ans Mac OS X. A plugin written in C should be
> available for all three systems.
>
> Alexandre
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> List address:    gimp-developer-list gnome org
> List membership:
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list



-- 
Ingo Lütkebohle, Dr.-Ing.
Machine Learning and Robotics Lab, IPVS, Universität Stuttgart
http://www.ipvs.uni-stuttgart.de/abteilungen/mlr/abteilung/mitarbeiter/Ingo.Luetkebohle
+49-711-685-88350

PGP Fingerprint 3187 4DEC 47E6 1B1E 6F4F  57D4 CD90 C164 34AD CE5B