Re: [Geary] term Storage in the accounts dialog

[fede inventati org]

Maybe "Local Storage" is more specific, but it doesn't suggest any 
better italian translation.
Anyway, I decided to keep the word "Archivio": I think that the context 
is enough not to be confused with archiving stuff.

Il 20.03.2014 18:46 Jim Nelson ha scritto:
> This is something we discussed internally a bit. We really didn't want
> to trouble the user with a lot of details and terms about database,
> disk space, and so forth. "Storage" was the simplest English term we
> could come up with to encapsulate what the preference selection was
> affecting. (Incidentally, we also plan on adding another Preference
> checkbox under the existing combo box, to the effect of "Delete email
> older than above value"; see
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=714101 [2])
>
> It's possible we could change the term to "Local Storage". Does that
> suggest an appropriate Italian translation for you?
>
> -- Jim
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:03 AM, fede inventati org wrote:
>
> > During the proofreading with the italian team it came out that
> > Storage may not be the best word in the context of the accounts
> > dialog. It's the word used to introduce the section where the
> > syncronization time is set (download last x emails). I have hard
> > time translating it into italian, because I would use Archivio,
> > which is already used for Archive, so in a different meaning. So I
> > was tempted to translate it very freely as Synchronization, but a
> > proofreader pointed out that I should have asked the developers
> > first and maybe propose a change. It's not just about the italian
> > translation.. Storage is really the best word to describe that
> > section? What do you think? Thanks Federico
> > _______________________________________________ geary-list mailing
> > list geary-list gnome org
> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/geary-list [1]
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/geary-list
> [2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=714101