Re: gnome-python-extras: revisited

Please keep the discussion on-list. I assume this was by accident.

btw, you really should upgrade your MUA. Evolution 1.2.2...? ;-)

On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 09:29 -0400, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote:
> Agreed, but... 
> The top level makefile attempts to build the entire release in the
> alphabetical order of the top level directory names, which is why I made
> the suggestion. 
> If this were the best of all possible worlds, a user who is new to
> GARNOME would fetch the stable garball, unpack it, cd to the top level,
> and type "make install". Those of us who have done this more than once
> know better. Still...  A desirable endpoint???

Well, I do see your point. Anyway, the LIBDEPS lines should handle and
reflect *all* dependencies. It it not a good idea IMHO to rely on the
shell and alphabetical order.

In an ideal world, the user would read the README -- and not fire up a
'make install' in the top-level directory. The README mentions this...


char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0  ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]