Re: Proposing game for inclusion

[Mario Wenzel <maweki gmail com>]

I do think that there is a difference between getting a drive-by for a C 
game (I don't like the C game but I do like the contribution) and making 
a commitment to maintain a game for 2, 5 or 10 years (gnome-robots 
should be that old by now, I guess).

The latter is a comittment for the whole team and not just the team as 
it is now but all future maintainers in the suggested time period.
Don't get me wrong, I am not comfortable with the state of our codebase 
as it is, either.

Am 16.04.2014 14:55, schrieb John Stowers:
> Specifically, I suggest that you are not getting drive by patches for 
> non Vala games because the position of the g-g team is that those 
> contributions are not welcomed. Furthermore, at the extreme, you are 
> evidently missing out on contributors because non-Vala games are not 
> welcome.