Re: Could a few influential GNOME develoers join gnu-prog-discuss gnu org?
- From: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>
- To: rms gnu org
- Cc: karl gnu org, foundation-list gnome org, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- Subject: Re: Could a few influential GNOME develoers join gnu-prog-discuss gnu org?
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:43:28 -0500
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 17:32 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> mention that this particular behaviour is specified:
> http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/xdg-user-dirs
>
> They can recommend, but they cannot "specify" anything for us. In the
> GNU Project we pay attention to standards, and usually we follow them,
> but not automatically or necessarily. For instance, GNU df and du
> give sizes in k by default, not in 512-byte blocks as POSIX
> "specifies". Likewise, GCC "violates" the ISO C spec if you don't use
> --pedantic.
>
> The standards made by POSIX, ISO and freedesktop.org are suggestions.
> They carry some weight because users typically appreciate
> compatibility with standards. But that's not the only thing users
> appreciate, so a standard is not a command for us to obey.
I don't think Bastien was implying that we have to follow this
behavior simply because it's specified somewhere. In fact, the
front page of freedesktop.org is very clear that it is not a
standards organization. Specification on freedesktop.org aren't
things we have to follow. Rather, they are formal write-ups of
things we've decided to do.
The way the comment was presented (and granted, we're missing
context here) was as if this behavior was a bug. Bastien was
saying it's intentional behavior, and that we've even written
down how it's supposed to work.
--
Shaun
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]