Re: Thanks, and a Brief Survey
- From: Stormy Peters <stormy peters gmail com>
- To: Philip Van Hoof <pvanhoof gnome org>
- Cc: foundation-list <foundation-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Thanks, and a Brief Survey
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:37:06 -0700
Dave, Philip,
Can you take this one offline unless there's another point you'd like to discuss with the whole Foundation list?
Stormy
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Philip Van Hoof
<pvanhoof gnome org> wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 18:57 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > I fully agree with this statement if you replace free software with open
> > source.
>
> Please stop trolling. This is not going to lead to anything productive
> (again).
As Lefty is clarifying here, this isn't trolling at all:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/foundation-list/2010-January/msg00041.html
I think the discussion about replacing free software with open source
has actually produced a very fruitful discussion and is creating a
productive outcome.
> > This is an excerpt of a private E-mail that Lefty sent me. The survey's
> > results are open for everybody so this ain't a secret anyway:
> >
> > "There's about twice the uptake for the term "open source software" as
> > there is for "free software"."
> >
> > If the board respects the results of the survey, which I think it should
> > do, it takes this into account.
> How about I do a poll whether people think PCs should run Windows or
> another desktop environment? If we respect the results we should stop
> developing GNOME.
Surveys should be conducted among foundation members. Not all PC users.
And when you represent my views, it's helpful to acknowledge what I
wrote in front of your reply in the same discussion thread.
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 18:05 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > Although I would accept that the foundation board has a decisive
> > role in this. Why else do we elect you guys and don't replace you
> > with surveys?
> Isn't leading by survey one of the issues you had with the Bush & Blair
> administrations?
This is completely besides the point.
(When did I say this, anyway? - reply privately -)
Cheers,
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]