Re: GNOME dependent on Mono

On Nov 29, 2007 3:13 PM, Luis Villa <luis tieguy org> wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2007 8:31 AM, BJörn Lindqvist <bjourne gmail com> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 29, 2007 1:33 PM, Luis Villa <luis tieguy org> wrote:
> > > I'll second this. The fact:fiction ratio of boycottnovell is just
> > > incredibly, incredibly bad.
> >
> > RMS message read "If part of it is not accurate, I hope someone will
> > explain." Do you care to sort out what is fact and what is fiction?
> Jeff has ably debunked this particular fiction already in the thread,
> and more generally ably debunked the FUD that Novell somehow controls
> the Foundation. As to the rest, I have better things to do with my
> life than to debunk the rest of boycottnovell post-by-post.

No. The boycottnovell site and the OP alluded to that there would be
moral, philosophical and or legal problems with GNOME depending on
Mono and or C#. Is that fact or is it fiction?

mvh Björn

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]