Re: GNOME dependent on Mono
- From: "Diego Escalante Urrelo" <diegoe gnome org>
- To: "BJörn Lindqvist" <bjourne gmail com>
- Cc: Luis Villa <luis tieguy org>, foundation-list gnome org, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <rms 1407 org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME dependent on Mono
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:09:46 +0000
On 11/29/07, BJörn Lindqvist <bjourne gmail com> wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2007 3:13 PM, Luis Villa <luis tieguy org> wrote:
> > On Nov 29, 2007 8:31 AM, BJörn Lindqvist <bjourne gmail com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Nov 29, 2007 1:33 PM, Luis Villa <luis tieguy org> wrote:
> > > > I'll second this. The fact:fiction ratio of boycottnovell is just
> > > > incredibly, incredibly bad.
> > >
> > > RMS message read "If part of it is not accurate, I hope someone will
> > > explain." Do you care to sort out what is fact and what is fiction?
> > Jeff has ably debunked this particular fiction already in the thread,
> > and more generally ably debunked the FUD that Novell somehow controls
> > the Foundation. As to the rest, I have better things to do with my
> > life than to debunk the rest of boycottnovell post-by-post.
> No. The boycottnovell site and the OP alluded to that there would be
> moral, philosophical and or legal problems with GNOME depending on
> Mono and or C#. Is that fact or is it fiction?
I once hurt my finger installing beagle, but that was because of
excesive computer use. The installation just triggered my problem.
We should buy boycottgnome.org before boycottnovell decides to expand
the franchise :).
(of course, just kidding)
] [Thread Prev