Re: GNOME dependent on Mono

["Luis Villa" <luis tieguy org>]

On Nov 29, 2007 12:44 PM, BJörn Lindqvist <bjourne gmail com> wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2007 3:13 PM, Luis Villa <luis tieguy org> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 29, 2007 8:31 AM, BJörn Lindqvist <bjourne gmail com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Nov 29, 2007 1:33 PM, Luis Villa <luis tieguy org> wrote:
> > > > I'll second this. The fact:fiction ratio of boycottnovell is just
> > > > incredibly, incredibly bad.
> > >
> > > RMS message read "If part of it is not accurate, I hope someone will
> > > explain." Do you care to sort out what is fact and what is fiction?
> >
> > Jeff has ably debunked this particular fiction already in the thread,
> > and more generally ably debunked the FUD that Novell somehow controls
> > the Foundation. As to the rest, I have better things to do with my
> > life than to debunk the rest of boycottnovell post-by-post.
>
> No. The boycottnovell site and the OP alluded to that there would be
> moral, philosophical and or legal problems with GNOME depending on
> Mono and or C#. Is that fact or is it fiction?

Ah, my apologies for misunderstanding the question. I don't have time
to answer right now (class beckons) but suffice it to say that there
are very diverse opinions on that question.

Luis