Re: GNOME dependent on Mono

On Nov 29, 2007 8:31 AM, BJörn Lindqvist <bjourne gmail com> wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2007 1:33 PM, Luis Villa <luis tieguy org> wrote:
> > On Nov 29, 2007 5:59 AM, Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org> wrote:
> > > <quote who="Rui Miguel Silva Seabra">
> > >
> > > > I think you're way too harsh on people who actually concluded things like:
> > >
> > > Sorry, but the negativity of that site greatly outweighs the positive. It
> > > takes more than a little sucking up to earn back my respect after the crap
> > > they've been spewing.
> >
> > I'll second this. The fact:fiction ratio of boycottnovell is just
> > incredibly, incredibly bad.
> RMS message read "If part of it is not accurate, I hope someone will
> explain." Do you care to sort out what is fact and what is fiction?

Jeff has ably debunked this particular fiction already in the thread,
and more generally ably debunked the FUD that Novell somehow controls
the Foundation. As to the rest, I have better things to do with my
life than to debunk the rest of boycottnovell post-by-post.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]