Re: Substituting "Linux" with "GNU/Linux" or "GNU"
- From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org>
- To: Germán Poó Caamaño <gpoo ubiobio cl>
- Cc: foundation-list gnome org, Yavor Doganov <yavor doganov org>
- Subject: Re: Substituting "Linux" with "GNU/Linux" or "GNU"
- Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:16:32 -0400
On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 15:44 -0400, Germ�Po�ama�rote:
> On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 18:01 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
> > [...]
> > - In the very few cases where the operative systems need to be
> > enumerated, we recommend the use of the formula "GNU/Linux (commonly
> > called Linux)", that has already been used i.e. in the release notes.
>
> If you refer 'operative system' as 'operating system', it has only
> one name: Linux.
>
> The discussion was always about the whole system, not the name of the
> operating system. Even, RMS said that.
This is not really clear. Some mean the kernel when they say "operating
system" (eg. in academy), others mean a lot more than that. Given what
is shipped with Windows and Mac OS X /operating systems/, one should
really contrast them to GNU, not Linux the kernel.
> Regards,
>
--
behdad
http://behdad.org/
"Commandment Three says Do Not Kill, Amendment Two says Blood Will Spill"
-- Dan Bern, "New American Language"
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]